Crime and Punishment – and Payment

 Crime and Punishment   and Payment

The PR Verdict: “B” (Good Show) for the US Government. (Pictured: Bank fraud whistle blower Brad Birkenfeld)

Who knew that whistle blowing could be so profitable? Bradley Birkenfeld, a former private banker for one of the leading Swiss banks, just landed a cool $104 million as his reward for ratting on his former employer. Big headlines yesterday, but as the news broke, Bradley wasn’t photographed in a glamourous nightspot celebrating his new win. He was in New Hampshire finishing his 40-month jail term in home confinement.

His evidence relating to tax evasion and non-declaration of foreign accounts has netted the US government over $5 billion, but that wasn’t enough to protect him from criminal charges. Prosecutors were unhappy with his previously withholding information about his own clients at the bank, which earned him 40 months in jail.

On the face of it, this seems a perverse result. But under existing legislation the Internal Revenue Service can pay whistleblower awards of up to 30 percent of the collected proceeds. Birkenfeld’s payment is being touted as proof that the US government is committed to rewarding courageous whistle blowers. The PR sting in the message is that ratting on others doesn’t give you immunity; not such a lottery win after all. The US government sent a clear signal that Brad is no angel, yet they’re no welchers.

The PR Verdict: “B” (Good Show) for the US Government. Sending mixed signals is sometimes the only way to accomplish goals. Complicated, yes; confusing, no.

The PR Takeaway: Bitter and sweet can live together, even if it seems sometimes counterintuitive. Birkenfeld’s payment sends a clear signal that the government takes the issue of fraud, and reward for whistle blowing, seriously, and is willing to share the upside of newfound gains. Yet Birkenfeld paid a personal price for wrongdoing. Birkenfeld, more than anyone, knows this, as he ponders his newfound fortune – and his ankle brace.

Should government entities send mixed messages of punishment and reward? Should Birkenfeld have received his whistle-blower payment even though he was sentenced? Give us your PR Verdict!

share save 171 16 Crime and Punishment   and Payment

What is Your PR Verdict?

  1. No, I’m sorry, I don’t agree that this sort of mixed signal is a good thing, criminals should not be rewarded after their jail term ends, and it just shows how screwed up the world financial system is and how little trust it inspires among the general public. And: I don’t think that Birkenfeld will ever be happy with his windfall, as whistleblowers tend not to be, having first participated in fraud and then ratted on his employers and their customers. But, as we know, money does not guarantee happiness, so this Is just more grist for the mill of the anti- wall- street demonstrators. More power to the 99 per cent!

Trackbacks

  1. BizSugar.com says:

    Crime and Punishment – and Payment…

    The PR Verdict: “B” (Good Show) for the US Government. Sending mixed signals is sometimes the only way to accomplish goals. Complicated, yes; confusing, no….

  2. Crime and Punishment – and Payment…

    The PR Verdict: “B” (Good Show) for the US Government. Sending mixed signals is sometimes the only way to accomplish goals. Complicated, yes; confusing, no….

Speak Your Mind

*


× five = 45

CommentLuv badge